12.16.2010

"Pretty Girl Rock" - Female Anthem or Arrogance?

At first glance this song, "Pretty Girl Rock" sung by Keri Hilson, is an anthem to females, isn't it? Asking us to do "the pretty girl rock", suggesting that we're all in some way beautiful. A lovely message indeed, however, if you really pay attention the lyrics of the song, it comes across with a tone of arrogance. I think my English major-ness is showing through here, because really, what general listener analyzes song lyrics? Haha, well, I guess I do.

In any case, I find that this is a piece promoting female arrogance. There portions of the song such as "All my ladies do the pretty girl rock rock rock / Get along with your pretty girl rock rock rock / Still show me your pretty girl rock rock rock / All my ladies do the pretty girl rock rock rock", "Sing it with me now", and "And if you know it too then ladies sing it with me" that do adhere to the anthem tone. The use of "[a]ll my ladies" and "[s]ing it with me" is inclusive, suggesting that all women are a part of this pretty girl rock or that all women should partake in it. A female anthem should certainly be all inclusive and promote that all females are strong and beautiful, no matter what. That's all fine and dandy, until we come to lines that completely negate this inclusiveness, in particular "I’m cuter than the girl that's with ya". This line here is the one that really brands this as arrogance for me; if all girls are beautiful and should be doing this pretty girl rock, then there should be no competition among them, which is exactly what this line suggests. It's segregating in that it's saying, 'yeah, all us ladies are beautiful, but some of us are still prettier than others', which in turn suggests that these 'prettier' women are the ones that should receive all the attention. Shouldn't a female anthem about beauty be more about "beauty in the eye of the beholder" and therefore no one can truly say what beauty is? I think so, but whoever (I'm unable to find a name) the lyricist for this song is apparently still stuck in the world of competition among everyone.

Interestingly, the lyricist seems to try and deflect this notion of arrogance within the lyrics: "Girls think I’m conceited 'cause I know I’m attractive". Knowing you're attractive is one thing, going around saying you're more attractive than others is where the conceited attitude comes in. It's called modesty, honey. I'm not saying that we all need to clam up about our beauty, or that we should berate ourselves so that we don't seem conceited--quite the contrary. Instead, let us celebrate this beauty because I don't think that there is a true celebration of universal female beauty these days, which is thoroughly disappointing, but that's another argument all together. So let's celebrate our beauty, but not go around shoving it in other people's faces and saying we're prettier than them. Let's not go around saying "Don't hate me 'cause I'm beautiful" because, really, you just come across seeming like an arrogant piece of work. While "[j]ealousy [may indeed be] the ugliest trait", to me it's positively ludicrous to think that people hate you simply because they are jealous, especially of something as subjective as beauty. You hate something or someone because there is something that you genuinely dislike about it/them; to say that these things/people are hated because of they are aesthetically pleasing is like saying, 'I think that sunset is so pretty that I absolutely hate it!' Ridiculous, yes?

True, as a society we might see someone that's really beautiful and say, 'oh my god, I hate you!' but here it's not a genuine hate. It's a playful hate that does show that the person is jealous, but it is not a loathing hatred--it's just a coloquial phrase that we throw around without really thinking about it. The lyrics of the song, on the other hand, seem to be suggesting that this hate is real and that it is spawned by the jealousy of beauty and the attention that this beautiful person is receiving. When you look at lines that portray the stares, paparazzi-like moments and the male attention that this beautiful woman is receiving and then at lines like "Girls think I’m conceited 'cause I know I’m attractive / Don’t worry about what I think, why don’t you ask him?" it positively is suggestive that the speaker is more beautiful than the woman she is talking to. "Don't worry about what I think" is saying that yes, the speaker sees herself as beautiful, but don't worry about what she thinks of herself because clearly everyone else thinks she is more beautiful as well. "[W]hy don't you ask him?" suggests that the not-so-beautiful woman's male signficant other obviously thinks that the speaker is more beautiful and what with all these "[c]ameras flashing" and "all eyes on [her] when [she] walks in", it is clear that the more beautiful are the ones that deserve the attention. While it could easily be a comment on society that that's just how it is, the fact that the lyrics continually repeat these things suggests a pushing towards this opinion instead of simply a comment upon it. If it were a comment upon it, I would think there would be some alternative view provided, or some disdain towards it, but we're celebrating the "pretty girl rock" here, so all the "pretty girls", which is not really as all-inclusive as it wants to come across, need to rock it out and strut around like a peacock.

To wrap this up, I must say that these are only my findings when it comes to this song. I haven't heard any uproar about it otherwise, not that I really expected to with the way media these days talk about things. I'd be interested to hear/read someone else's argument otherwise, or just any opinions in general.



I am quoting these lyrics as I have found them on azlyrics.com.

2.13.2010

Media, You Make Me Sick

These are my reactions, disgusted and outraged, with things that CNN anchors were saying on January the 14th, which was among the first days of the Haiti Earthquake coverage, I think. For whatever reason, I only thought to post this here just now.

The italics are quotes or near-quotes from CNN anchors. (I went from memory, but they're close.)


"We warn you, some of the images you are about to see may be disturbing."

Disturbing? Really? Perhaps you are just saying that to cover yourself legally, but I personally don't find the images of crumbling and fallen buildings crowding the streets to be "disturbing". In fact, I'd go to say that that is not disturbing-we go to the movies to see that and these real life images aren't any different other than the fact that they won't go away when the cameras do (now that's disturbing).

What I find disturbing are the images of the true devastation to human life. For instance, the injured-none of which you are really showing. You've done a good job at picking the un-physically-affected people, haven't you? Or maybe you just can't show the devastation on human life beyond bodies covered in sheets and blanket and sobbing family members. That's not to say that I'm sadistic enough that I want to see mangled forms, but if you're going to show the true impact of the situation, show us what can't be rebuilt. Edifices can be replaced. Human life cannot.

And if you find these images so disturbing, why is your voice flat? Why are your eyes dead? Why don't you cringe?

"It was such a fragile country to begin with."

And yet you didn't care about it until you could ream a story from it. Amazing how it takes a natural disaster for us to pay attention to a place that needs help.

"Even the president wasn't spared."

And you expected he would be? You expected the quake to come along and say, "Oh! This is the pres' house! I must not touch!" and then mosey along on its way while conveniently leaving his house standing? If you did…then you're a moron.

"President homeless."

I'm glad at least he has the right idea. Let's focus on helping others, shall we? Instead of like you want to do. All you want to do is focus on where he's going to sleep tonight. What about everyone else? They're just as homeless as he is, but you don't care about them, do you? They're not as important, it seems.

"We've heard that all this relief has been sent to help, but we're still seeing the same images."

Seriously? You just said that? Look, honey, it's not going to be immediate sunshine and rainbows just because the ever-mighty U.S sent a bunch of help in metal flying machines. If anything, maybe we should expect it to get worse, considering the 'help' that has been sent to other countries. If you want immediate results, go watch a movie.

"I'm sure we'll hear many more amazing survival stories as the days go on."

It's fantastic that there are survivors, but all you seem to care about are the stories. Here I see your eyes light up and a smile tug at your lips, which I find more disturbing than any of the images I've seen so far. How dare you think only of the story when this is real life disaster? People's lives are at stake and all you care about is getting the big scoop. Stop thinking like a reporter with a quota and start thinking like a compassionate human being. You make me sick.


I had to turn of the T.V. and walk away here, so thoroughly disgusted with you that I would only get angrier if I continued. Only get louder in yelling at the television (even though that does nothing more than let me vent into the air).

I'm so happy that you care when you can get a story out of it. I'm so thrilled that your eyes light up when there is death and destruction for you to talk about. I'm ecstatic that you now have something to talk about for the next week and a half instead of how crumby the economy is or that guy who said Obama was a good candidate because he was "light skinned" and doesn't speak in "negro dialect". Good for you.

Yes, I'm thoroughly disgusted.